Real Estate Market Updates


The real estate market — with all its rollercoaster-like dips and turns — has occupied a huge amount of our attention in recent years. While most of the news has been bad (record foreclosures, innumerable bad loans), much has also been made of this cheerful fact: Single women have become a major force in the real estate market. According to the National Association of Realtors, last year unmarried gals made up 20 percent of all home buyers, where single guys accounted for 12 percent.

Why the discrepancy between men and women? No one seems to be able to put their finger on it exactly. I personally think it’s because the concept of home resonates so strongly with women. Regardless of our marital status, we want to come home from work to a place that feels like ours.

According to the Joint Center for Housing Studies, the three main reasons single women are buying homes in record numbers are: to relocate closer to a job or family; because they need more space; and, the No. 1 reason cited, because they have a strong desire, plain and simple, to nest. I rest my case.

Realtors and builders are taking notice of this trend. In new home construction, builders are putting in extras such as security features, gourmet kitchens and yards with little to no maintenance required.

(more…)

Most of America won’t shed a tear for those who own higher-priced homes, especially given that the median home price in the nation has now fallen to just $174,000, but investors and homeowners alike should take note: Higher priced homes are taking a hit and the outlook for them is worse than the overall market.

In Santa Cruz prices have dropped on high end homes from 17-40%. Many great opportunites exist for beach front homes. Demand on the low end of the housing market is boosted by investors largely buying distressed properties; they either fix up and flip the homes or rent them out, waiting for the market to recover. Higher end homes have far fewer investors and may be more sensitive to a volatile stock market, as potential buyers are more likely to be invested there.

Read the article online at CNBC.

In the profile of first time homebuyers for 2009 presented by the National Association of Realtors, the number of single females buying a home for the first time far outnumbered those of single males. In fact, 21% of all purchasers were female.

Some other statistics of first time home buyers were:

  • 46% were married, 13% unmarried, 21% female, 19% male
  • Median household size is 2, 75% had 2 or more living in the household
  • 51% are between the ages of 25-30
  • 81% bought single family homes, 16% bought condos
  • Median size home purchased was 1600 sq ft, typically comprised of 3beds/2baths
  • 31% bought because they could finally afford it and were tired of paying rent
  • Location and neighborhood was chosen as the #1 reason to buy
  • Only 10% bought because of the $8000 tax credit
  • In the summer of 2009, NAR Research surveyed recent home buyers about their experience with the home search process, and the use of real estate professionals in purchasing a home. The results of the survey were published in the 2009 NAR Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers.

    Results of that survey show that a significant share of Santa Cruz home buyers are single women. Indeed, the percentage of single-women buyers has increased from 14 percent in 1995 to 21 percent in 2009. These home purchasers account for the second largest share of adult households who purchase homes. Single females make up one-quarter of the first-time buyer population and 17 percent of the repeat buyer population. We look at some results below from the most recent Profile to get a better description of who single women buyers are.

    (more…)

    On April 13, 2010, the Governor signed SB 401, which partially conforms California tax rules to the federal cancellation of debt (“COD”) exclusion for principal residences, as well as numerous other changes enacted since January 1, 2005. While the partial COD conformity will be retroactive to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, most of the other conformity items will not be effective until the 2010 taxable year.  If you’ve already filed your 2009 CA tax return without the COD relief, you can file an amended CA tax return to take advantage of the new rules.

    Like the federal exclusion for qualified principal residence debt, the CA exclusion will apply to discharges occurring on or after January 1, 2009, and before January 1, 2013. However, here are the California differences:

    • Qualified principal residence indebtedness may be limited to $800,000 ($400,000 for married filing a separate return) instead of the federal $2 million ($1 million for married filing a separate return); and
    • The maximum cancellation of debt income (COD) exclusion may be further limited to $500,000 ($250,000 for taxpayers married filing separately).

    The newly signed legislation provides for conformity of CA rules to federal rules in numerous other areas as well, but there remain many significant differences between CA tax rules and federal tax rules.  As always, be sure to consult with a qualified tax professional to ensure that you are able to make the most of your specific situation. 

    Provided courtesy of Jeanette Anderson, CPA, CFE
    Anderson Accountancy Corporation
    (831) 688-1977
    www.andersonaccountancycorp.com

    A new bill is on the CA Governor’s desk awaiting signature which will enact a modified version of last year’s New Home Credit.  The bill provides CA tax credits for first-time home buyers and taxpayers buying homes that have never been occupied.  

    Taxpayers who purchase a “qualified principal residence” on or after May 1, 2010 and before January 1, 2011, will be allowed a credit equal to the lesser of 5% of the purchase price of the home or $10,000.  The credit is also available to taxpayers who enter into an enforceable contract during the applicable time period, as long as the purchase is completed before August 1, 2011. 

    Like the prior New Home Credit, there are some requirements:
    1)      The home must be a “qualified principal residence”
    2)      The taxpayer must apply the credit in equal amounts over 3 successive tax years
    3)      The credits are non-refundable, will not reduce AMT & cannot be carried over 

    Another important point – the state has established a $100 million dollar limit for this credit, which  will be used on a first-come, first-serve basis.  In order to ensure you are able to utilize this credit, make those purchases soon!  Once the total of $100 million in credits have been used by taxpayers, no more will be allowed, even if all other criteria are met.

    Contact: Jeanette Anderson, CPA, CFE
    Anderson Accountancy Corporation, (831) 688-1977
    www.andersonaccountancycorp.com

    The recent changes in the Appraisal Industry have to do with FHA becoming HVCC compliant and implementing an appraiser independence and Appraisal Management Company format.  

    The FHA has announced a series changes to be implemented by February 15th in Mortgagee Letter 2009-28, stating that “FHA Approved lenders have new responsibilities to ensure that FHA appraisers are ‘…compensated at a rate that is customary and reasonable for appraisal services in the market area…’” and “the fee for the actual completion of an FHA appraisal may not include a fee for management of the appraisal process or any activity other than the performance of the appraisal.” “AMC and other third party fees must not exceed what is customary and reasonable for such services provided in the market area of the property being appraised.” 

    Appraisers are hoping this this FHA policy will help to keep appraisers fees reasonable and not so low that appraisers are forced to leave the profession for lack of compensation and inability to bring in a living wage. 

    Also, locally it appears that market values throughout most neighborhoods in Santa Cruz county appear to be levelling out and stabalizing over the past 3-6 months.  This means that appraisers are no longer having to use “negative time adjustments” in our reports.

    Posted by Kristina Campbell, Coast Home Appraisal, 831-247-7223

    A recent industry study found the following about women homebuyers:

    Women may be inclined to make up their mind quickly.
    —When asked how long it took before they knew their home was “right” for them, almost 70% of women had made up their mind the day they walked into the house. Only 23% of women felt the need to visit the home a second time to make a purchasing decision.

    Women would rather live closer to their extended family than to their job.
    —55 percent of women find it more important to be closer to their extended family (those that do not live in their household) than to their job.

    A home’s security is a deal-breaker for women.
    —64 percent of women said that if they found the home of their dreams but had concerns about its security, they would no longer be interested.

    Couples say that no one “wears the pants in the relationship” in terms of major financial decisions.
    —When asked who wears the pants in the relationship (when it comes to major financial decisions, such as purchasing a home), almost 70% of respondents living with their significant other said it’s actually mutual.

    If you want a Realtor® that understand a women’s needs and concerns, contact Carol VanAusdal or Micah Fox today.

    The foreclosure wave is here — look beneath the headlines

    • Notice-of-Trustee Sales are up 100% from Feb to May and subsequent foreclosures are up 75% from March to May.
    • CA foreclosure activity outpaces total house sales by 100% – infinite supply

    In early April I was digging around my default and foreclosure database reviewing servicer and originator specific foreclosure numbers and noticed that a couple of the nation’s leading servicers were acting funny. At that point, most servicers had been ratcheting up Notice-of-Defaults for three months while scaling back sharply on filing new Notice-of-Trustee Sales. Subsequent foreclosures had been bouncing off of year and a half lows since October. Based upon the evidence from the two previously mentioned large-bank servicers, I then made the call about a wave of foreclosures about to hit.

    The wave is here even though it did not show up in the aggregate numbers released by RealtyTrac yesterday morning. In their report, CA aggregate foreclosure activity was reported down 4.46%. That is not accurate.

    To read the complete article

    If you or someone you know is facing foreclosure contact your bank, or your realtor to get help in finding out your options.

    Recent headlines may be causing confusion about the new California Foreclosure Prevention Act as a “90-day moratorium” and not telling the complete story.

    In truth, the foreclosure process for certain owner-occupied residential first trust deeds has been extended by 90 days, effective June 15, but an exemption is available for lenders with comprehensive loan modification programs.

    Under pre-existing law that went into effect in February, a lender must wait three months after filing a notice of default before it can file a notice of sale. The new California Foreclosure Prevention Act extended that time frame by another 90 days but may just be delaying the inevitable.

    Read the complete story in the Mercury News

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.